Algorithms Don’t Get Bent. Divers Do! DAN's new reseach findings and where Ratio Deco 3.0 can help with.


I’ve been reading the latest DAN Europe paper on decompression risk factors, and I think it reinforces something many of us have felt for years.

Decompression is becoming less about algorithms and more about physiology.

For decades we’ve debated gradient factors, dissolved gas models, bubble models, deep stops, shallow stops… and while those discussions are valuable, they all have one thing in common:

They primarily describe the DIVE. Not the DIVER.

The DAN paper demonstrates that factors such as workload, thermal stress, surface intervals, and even exercise before diving influence decompression risk. That’s a significant shift in thinking. It reminds us that two divers can perform the same dive and have completely different physiological responses.

That got me thinking about three areas that I believe deserve even more attention.

First, exercise before diving.

The paper identifies exercise before diving as a risk factor, but it doesn’t tell us what kind of exercise, how intense it was, or how long before the dive it occurred.

Personally, I wonder whether we’re looking at a hormetic response rather than a simple “exercise is good” or “exercise is bad” conclusion.

Could moderate aerobic exercise a few hours before diving improve vascular function and prepare the body for decompression?

Could strenuous exercise, on the other hand, create dehydration, glycogen depletion, elevated CO₂ production, muscle damage, and inflammatory stress that increase susceptibility to DCS?

I don’t know. But I think it’s a question worth investigating.

Second, decompression quality.

Most decompression discussions assume the ascent is executed exactly as planned.

Reality is often different. One diver ascends smoothly, maintains depth within a few centimetres, breathes calmly, and arrives at every stop precisely.

Another constantly oscillates through the stops, fights buoyancy, kicks to regain position, breathes harder, and works throughout the ascent.

On paper, both divers completed the same decompression. Did they really?

Perhaps we’ve spent decades evaluating decompression algorithms while paying too little attention to how well the decompression was actually executed.

Finally, planning versus reacting.

This is where I believe the value of Ratio Deco 3.0 becomes increasingly relevant.

Modern dive computers are remarkable pieces of technology, but I’m still perfectly happy diving with nothing more than a bottom timer. :-)

Fundamentally, they are reactive.

They tell you what your decompression obligation has become based on everything that has already happened. They calculate a Time To Surface.

They don’t explain why the decompression obligation changed, or how that change affects the distribution of the remaining stops.

They don’t help you understand the gas implications of those changes or how they affect your gas availability throughout the remainder of the ascent.

They don’t teach you how changes in depth, bottom time, ascent strategy, or gas switches affect the rest of the dive.

Ratio Deco 3.0 approaches a decompression strategy differently.

Before entering the water, the diver already understands:

  • where the decompression is likely to occur,
  • how the obligation is distributed,
  • how much gas each phase of the ascent requires,
  • and how to make informed adjustments if the dive changes.

If, during the dive, you deliberately decide to change the plan, RD3.0 allows you to predict both the new decompression obligation and the associated gas requirements before your dive computer, it has to do the change and measure the effect before you can expect a finished recalculation.

The computer remains an excellent instrument—but it should just be one source of information, rather than the sole decision-maker.

To me, that’s the real takeaway from this DAN paper. The future of decompression won’t come from a smarter computer. It will come from creating smarter divers. The algorithm calculates the decompression. The diver executes it.

Here is a link to the paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41914190/


Learn all about how to take control
LIVE ! with Ben Bos

LIVE Ratio Deco 3.0
course with Ben Bos

Join Ben, on 2 x 3 hour long ZOOM sessions and learn all about Ratio Deco 3.0 on July 12th and July 19th.

Read more →


Get access to the UTD Ratio Deco 3.0 course materials here!

A comprehensive course covering everything Yo need to know about Ratio Deco 3.0
The rest of July 33% off!

That's it for this newsletter. We hope you enjoy our latest content and find it helpful in your journey to master your craft. Stay tuned for more updates, and don't forget to share your progress and insights with our community on social media!

Stay sharp and see you out there ( or online in ZOOM ;-) )

Ben Bos

Unified Team Diving

Training Thinking Divers

Vestermøllevej 3, Skanderborg, Jylland 8660
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Unified Team Diving

Subscribe to stay connected and keep growing as a thinking diver.

Read more from Unified Team Diving

UNIFIED TEAM DIVING INSIGHTS Edition: November 2025 Welcome back! Hey Everyone, It has been a minute, but welcome back to the 'Unified Team Diving Insights' newsletter. This resource is designed to help fuel your journey as a Thinking Diver. Also, we will be at DEMA this month in Orlando. If you're there, we'd love to see you! Ideas UTD Coaching Program Can Help You Gain Clarity on Next Steps in your SCUBA Journey Are you at a crossroads in your scuba diving journey, unsure of which path to...

Hey Everyone, When we started Unified Team Diving one of the problems – actually projects is a better word for that – was explaining why you, or anyone, particularly an instructor candidate, would choose to either cross over or do their initial training with a small, boutique scuba training and certification agency. The behemoth agencies are easy, available, and likely a guaranteed pass. So why us? Over the next few months you'll be hearing a lot more about the history of UTD, our training...

Hey Everyone, If you have been following our podcasts, particularly my “carcasts,” in episode #84 I took a look at why I think we – Unified Team Diving – are not for everyone. And although that may seem like anti-marketing, it’s important to me and the UTD team that we don’t pursue customers and clients who may not be best served by the training systems we provide. But then our director of development, Jay Gardner, pointed out to me maybe I could have spent a bit more time talking about who...